Denver Colorado Patent Prosecution (USPTO) Attorney
Filing a patent application is only the first step in securing your intellectual property rights. The real work begins after your application is submitted. Patent prosecution is the complex, highly strategic negotiation process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to convince a patent examiner that your invention is novel, non-obvious, and worthy of an issued patent.
At Williams Intellectual Property, we have spent over a decade navigating the USPTO’s intricate guidelines. Serving clients across Denver and nationwide, we represent inventors and businesses through every stage of patent prosecution — aggressively defending your claims, overcoming examiner rejections, and guiding your application toward allowance.
Get a Free Prosecution Strategy Session
The Strategic Importance of Skilled Patent Prosecution
When your patent application is assigned to a USPTO examiner, it is almost guaranteed to face rejections in the form of an Office Action. Examiners are tasked with protecting the public domain, and their initial reaction is often to reject claims based on “prior art” (existing patents, publications, or products) that they believe are similar to your invention.
How your attorney responds to these rejections is critical. Inexperienced filers often make the mistake of immediately narrowing their claims to satisfy the examiner, which severely limits the commercial value of the resulting patent. At Williams Intellectual Property, we employ a highly sophisticated prosecution strategy. We analyze the examiner’s cited prior art, identify the logical and technical flaws in their rejections, and draft persuasive legal arguments to overcome those rejections while preserving the broadest possible claim scope.
Our Comprehensive Patent Prosecution Services
We manage the entire lifecycle of your application before the USPTO:
1. Responding to USPTO Office Actions
When the USPTO issues an Office Action, we conduct a rigorous analysis of the examiner’s reasoning. We then draft a comprehensive response. This may involve submitting legal arguments demonstrating that the examiner misunderstood your technology or misapplied the prior art, or making strategic, surgical amendments to your claims to overcome the rejection without sacrificing your core protection.
2. Conducting Examiner Interviews
One of the most effective tools in patent prosecution is the examiner interview. Rather than engaging in endless rounds of written correspondence, we regularly schedule direct video or phone conferences with USPTO examiners. This allows us to explain the technical nuances of your invention, address the examiner’s concerns in real-time, and negotiate a mutually agreeable path to allowance, saving you time and money.
3. Track One & Accelerated Examination
For startups and businesses facing urgent market pressures, we can file a request for prioritized examination (Track One). This fast-tracks your application, bypassing the standard multi-year backlog and yielding a final decision from the USPTO in under 12 months. We manage all accelerated examination requirements to keep your application on the fast track.
4. Continuation and Divisional Applications
Even after your patent is allowed, your prosecution strategy may continue. We often file Continuation Applications to keep a pending application alive at the USPTO, allowing you to secure additional claims that target competitors’ products as they enter the market. We also handle Divisional Applications when the USPTO rules that your original application contains more than one independent invention.
Navigating the USPTO Prosecution Timeline
The path from filing to issuance involves several critical milestones:
Milestone | What Happens | Our Strategic Management |
|---|---|---|
1. Application Filing | Your non-provisional application is submitted to the USPTO. | We ensure all formal documents, drawings, and fees are properly executed. |
2. Art Unit Assignment | The USPTO assigns your application to a specialized technology center and examiner. | We monitor the assignment and prepare for the specific examiner’s historical trends. |
3. First Office Action | The examiner issues their initial review, typically rejecting some or all claims. | We conduct a prior art analysis and draft a comprehensive, strategic response. |
4. Examiner Interview | We hold a direct conference with the examiner to resolve technical disputes. | We negotiate claim language in real-time to accelerate allowance. |
5. Notice of Allowance | The examiner officially approves your application for issuance. | We perform a final review of the allowed claims and pay the government issue fees. |
6. Patent Issuance | Your patent is officially issued, and you receive the physical patent certificate. | We transition your patent to our portfolio monitoring and maintenance system. |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
An Office Action is a formal document from a USPTO examiner detailing their review of your patent application. Receiving an Office Action is completely normal — over 80% of utility patent applications receive at least one rejection in their first Office Action. It is not a sign of failure; it is simply the opening round of negotiations. We regularly overcome these rejections to secure issued patents.
A Restriction Requirement is a specific type of preliminary Office Action where the examiner rules that your application contains more than one distinct invention. By law, a single patent can only cover one invention. When this happens, we must “elect” one invention to prosecute in the current application, and we can file “Divisional Applications” later to protect the other inventions without losing your original priority date.
If the examiner issues a Final Office Action rejecting your claims a second time, the standard prosecution cycle ends. However, we can keep the negotiation alive by filing a Request for Continued Examination (RCE), which restarts the prosecution cycle and gives us another opportunity to submit arguments, amend claims, or conduct interviews.
Track One is an optional program offered by the USPTO that allows inventors to pay an additional government fee to fast-track their application. Under Track One, the USPTO guarantees that your application will receive a final disposition (either an allowance or a final rejection) within 12 months of filing. This is a highly effective strategy for startups looking to secure patents quickly to attract venture capital.
Yes. If we reach an impasse with a patent examiner who refuses to withdraw an unreasonable rejection, we can file an appeal with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB is an administrative tribunal of highly experienced administrative patent judges who will review the examiner’s decision and can overrule their rejections.
Work with an Experienced Denver Patent Prosecutor
Do not let USPTO backlogs or complex rejections stall your business goals. Partner with a registered patent attorney who has spent over a decade successfully navigating the USPTO to get patents issued.
Schedule Your Free Prosecution Strategy Session Today
FREE CONSULTATION
TESTIMONIALS
“William Intellectual Property assisted in my trademark registration. I was very pleased with the team’s results. Ben and team did a great job walking me through the process, expected costs, and were very quick to respond to any official responses from the US Patent & Trademark Office. I would recommend and use them again!”
Chris R